In writing my first ten-minute screenplay (based at the location mentioned below), I have learned a lot. Feature films have more time to develop things and to let the tension build gradually before reaching a satisfying resolution. However, if your script is only 9-10 pages long, you have to focus on the little details in order to get the job done effectively in a short amount of time.
By far the most important thing a young (or new) screenwriter should know is that one must show, not tell wherever possible. Sometimes this seems difficult, but it can be as easy as having a character always choosing spaghetti when they go out to eat and heartily enjoying it instead of proclaiming "I love spaghetti!" at some point in your script.
This rule is especially true for a short screenplay. It might seem easier to have your characters save time by describing something that has happened but this can quickly make your story dull and your audience uninterested. Take us to the scene of the crime. Have your characters show their traits instead of talking about them. Use flashbacks to tell about a hard time in your character's life instead of letting them emote to someone else over a cup of coffee.
Here is an example of what I mean from the BBC show Coupling. Not only does it use flashbacks instead of letting the characters discuss the party, this clip also shows two different perspectives. These perspectives effectively give away information about both characters too.
It might seem simple enough, but exposition scenes (one character talking to another about something that has happened, how they're feeling, an issue in their life, etc) can creep in without the writer realizing. They should be avoided at all costs! If you must use one, spice it up by adding props or extend it over several different locations, like your characters' commute to work, to keep the audience's attention.
Friday 13 November 2009
Thursday 5 November 2009
Impressionistic Writing
im·pres·sion·ism
Pronunciation: im-'pre-sh&-"ni-z&m
Function: noun
1. often capitalized: a theory or practice in painting especially among French painters of about 1870 of depicting the natural appearances of objects by means of dabs or strokes of primary unmixed colors in order to simulate actual reflected light
2. a: the depiction (as in literature) of scene, emotion, or character by details intended to achieve a vividness or effectiveness more by evoking subjective and sensory impressions than by recreating an objective reality
b: a style of musical composition designed to create subtle moods and impressions
I have a deadline coming up that is for an impressionistic resume based on a location of our choosing. The word 'resume' initially confused me because, to me, a resume is what the English would refer to as a CV. However, it is not a list of my multiple part-time jobs and my educational experience - it is an atypical essay that isn't really an essay at all.
Impressionistic writing is not something I have regularly encountered - and certainly not attempted to write myself - but many may be familiar with it as it is a format used by Jack Kerouac. I have found it difficult but enjoyable for a number of reasons.
Difficult, firstly, because impressionistic writing is not as concerned with structure and format as typical essay writing or literary work. Having come straight from an undergraduate degree throughout which I wrote about thirty essays of various lengths and a dissertation, it has been a very hard habit to break.
This exercise was also unexpectedly rewarding. Words have more emphasis placed on them when describing things impressionistically. My writing was forced to become a bit more poetic and I was conscious of how carefully I was picking my words. I am a very technical writer and I have found that this somewhat fragmented form has temporarily released me from that.
Impressionistic writing flows like the writer's consciousness, meaning that things do not necessarily have a given order. When I think of stream-of-consciousness writing, I immediately recall reading Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse for a unit on Classical English Literature that I did in my first year of university. She is an author many people consider to write this way and I agree. Impressionistic writing is about describing something with all your senses and your feelings towards the place. You can inspire certain moods with it as often the descriptions are very vivid and make it easy to imagine that you are standing in the writer's shoes. The writer is not concerned with presenting something as accurately as possible because it is personal - it is their impression of a person, place, or thing. Sentences are not perfect and many are short, perhaps even consisting of a single word. The beginning, middle, and end are not always clear and may not follow each other in a typical narrative style.
What helps, of course, is having a very beautiful and unique location to write about. Here is a photograph of the place that I chose for this assignment.
Pronunciation: im-'pre-sh&-"ni-z&m
Function: noun
1. often capitalized: a theory or practice in painting especially among French painters of about 1870 of depicting the natural appearances of objects by means of dabs or strokes of primary unmixed colors in order to simulate actual reflected light
2. a: the depiction (as in literature) of scene, emotion, or character by details intended to achieve a vividness or effectiveness more by evoking subjective and sensory impressions than by recreating an objective reality
b: a style of musical composition designed to create subtle moods and impressions
I have a deadline coming up that is for an impressionistic resume based on a location of our choosing. The word 'resume' initially confused me because, to me, a resume is what the English would refer to as a CV. However, it is not a list of my multiple part-time jobs and my educational experience - it is an atypical essay that isn't really an essay at all.
Impressionistic writing is not something I have regularly encountered - and certainly not attempted to write myself - but many may be familiar with it as it is a format used by Jack Kerouac. I have found it difficult but enjoyable for a number of reasons.
Difficult, firstly, because impressionistic writing is not as concerned with structure and format as typical essay writing or literary work. Having come straight from an undergraduate degree throughout which I wrote about thirty essays of various lengths and a dissertation, it has been a very hard habit to break.
This exercise was also unexpectedly rewarding. Words have more emphasis placed on them when describing things impressionistically. My writing was forced to become a bit more poetic and I was conscious of how carefully I was picking my words. I am a very technical writer and I have found that this somewhat fragmented form has temporarily released me from that.
Impressionistic writing flows like the writer's consciousness, meaning that things do not necessarily have a given order. When I think of stream-of-consciousness writing, I immediately recall reading Virginia Woolf's To the Lighthouse for a unit on Classical English Literature that I did in my first year of university. She is an author many people consider to write this way and I agree. Impressionistic writing is about describing something with all your senses and your feelings towards the place. You can inspire certain moods with it as often the descriptions are very vivid and make it easy to imagine that you are standing in the writer's shoes. The writer is not concerned with presenting something as accurately as possible because it is personal - it is their impression of a person, place, or thing. Sentences are not perfect and many are short, perhaps even consisting of a single word. The beginning, middle, and end are not always clear and may not follow each other in a typical narrative style.
What helps, of course, is having a very beautiful and unique location to write about. Here is a photograph of the place that I chose for this assignment.
Sunday 1 November 2009
Happy Halloween!
Chris carved a pumpkin in my kitchen for Halloween. Before he cut the face into it he scooped out as much of the pumpkin flesh (not the stringy bits!) as possible so that we could make homemade pumpkin soup for dinner. It was delicious and I now have a carved pumpkin on the window sill. I roasted the seeds as well - when you're a student you're always up for getting a lot of bang for your buck!Here's the recipe for the soup with our changes/substitutions. The original is from BBC Good Food.
Pumpkin Soup
1 tbsp olive oil
2 onions, finely chopped
1kg pumpkin, chopped into chunks
700ml chicken stock
salt and pepper
1/2 tbsp curry powder
142ml creme fraiche
handful roasted pumpkin seeds
1. Heat the oil in a large pan. Add the onion and cook for about 5 minutes, until soft.
2. Add the pumpkin and cook for 8-10 minutes, stirring occasionally. It will be soft and turn slightly more golden.
3. Add the stock and season with salt and pepper, then add the curry powder. Bring to a boil and then simmer for 10 minutes until the pumpkin is very soft.
4. Add the creme fraiche and bring back to the boil. Blend with a hand blender.
5. Serve hot and scattered with roasted pumpkin seeds.
According to the website, it can also be frozen for up to 2 months. This made enough for both of us to have for dinner last night (a good hearty serving!) and again for lunch today as well as a single portion which is sitting in my freezer for another cold day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)